tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8670182.post109911738336456652..comments2007-04-15T20:52:51.076-07:00Comments on Bush Wired: NEW!!! BULGE NEWS: Mother Jones article -NEW PHOTO...iconehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17892988082549172013noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8670182.post-1128458140049387592005-10-04T13:35:00.000-07:002005-10-04T13:35:00.000-07:00Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely go...Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!<BR/><BR/>I have a Free site <A HREF="http://www.free-article-search.com" REL="nofollow">Free Article Search</A>. It pretty much covers author award fi sci related stuff.<BR/><BR/>Come and check it out if you get time :-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8670182.post-1128268720908584702005-10-02T08:58:00.000-07:002005-10-02T08:58:00.000-07:00Looking for home security info and perimiter cams...Looking for <A HREF="http://home-security.my-x10.com/" REL="nofollow">home security</A> info and perimiter cams I found our site. I agree totally!jonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01651218261421130635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8670182.post-1128260321729254292005-10-02T06:38:00.000-07:002005-10-02T06:38:00.000-07:00You have a nice blog here. Did you knowthere Is A ...You have a nice blog here. Did you know<BR/>there Is A 90% Chance That Your Computer Has AdWare Or Spyware On It Right NOW!<BR/><BR/>Spyware and Adware viruses have rapidly become the number one threat to your computer with over 90% of computers already infected. These include trojans, bugs, ad serving software, monitoring software and more.<BR/>I also have a <A HREF="http://www.fvinc.4t.com/ol2.html" REL="nofollow">anti avg virus</A> site-blog. It can help you find and get rid of spyware, adware plus other stuff pn your computer for good. Free downloads.<BR/>You should check it out if you get the time!Online Incomeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12373343603046036831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8670182.post-1099262706843978392004-10-31T14:45:00.000-08:002004-10-31T14:45:00.000-08:00Credibility. It's what every journalist strives f...Credibility. It's what every journalist strives for, and it's what every reader should demand from their news and news sources.<br /><br />I think this is why the media is dragging their feet on this issue. As "sure" as we may be about this, the fact is that the only thing close to being "provable" is that there was something beneath Bush's jacket. All the stuff about Bush's strange pauses, etc., really do not prove much. It does diminish the credibility of the story, though, and that of all internet bloggers.<br /><br />Any journalist that puts out this story risks their credibility. The only safe thing for them to do is to "cover the coverage" (read this article: http://www.wnyc.org/onthemedia/transcripts/transcripts_101504_bulge.html). If their article seems to accuse Bush of cheating, they'd better have some solid proof.<br /><br />This whole thing smells like a Karl Rove Trap. Bush may well have been wired in debate #1, but probably wasn't after that. Rove seems to have made sure the bulge was even more obvious for the other debates, though, and has been purposely dodging a credible explanation, in order to stoke the rumor mill. All the Indy Media / "Brad Menfil" stuff smells fishy. <br /><br />If he gets a journalist to take his bait, he'll probably then produce a realistic, innocent explanation for the bulge (that couldn't be revealed earlier for national security reasons, naturally). In the end, the journalist loses their reputation, the media looks even more liberally-biased, the internet bloggers are made to look like fools, and Bush is made to look like an innocent victim of a vast left-wing conspiracy.<br /><br />Can you blame the media for staying away? Rove is a very smart man. Machiavellan, but smart. He's too smart to let Bush get caught cheating, and has had plenty of time to create a plausible, legitimate cover story to explain the bulge. He's just hoping to bring down a few opponents in the process.<br /><br />Perhaps it's the media (and internet bloggers) who are really having their puppet strings pulled.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8670182.post-1099255241560147602004-10-31T12:40:00.000-08:002004-10-31T12:40:00.000-08:00Last week I asked John Dean to help our cause. He ...Last week I asked John Dean to help our cause. He did make a comment on it. He also, like me, called it worst than Watergate.EasyRiderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00401551443853734456noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8670182.post-1099209066015298342004-10-31T00:51:00.000-07:002004-10-31T00:51:00.000-07:00I have tried to post a comment on the "Dark Side" ...I have tried to post a comment on the "Dark Side" story, but it will not take me there. I am getting discouraged at this point. I don't need to see a bulge or a wire to know that this president has been receiving responses through some sort of device. I watch all the video feeds, everything, and he cannot say more than 3-5 words without a pause......waiting for the next line. I am discouraged about the media "they" say is liberal. Where are the Jack Andersons? Isn't someone willing to risk it all for the truth? I still believe Anita, and I would believe any hero that may come forward. I am scared politically for the first time in my life. This administration is frightening. There must be some insider, some John Dean, that would reveal all. I am fearful every time this administration invokes God's name, shame on them. I am fearful for our troops, I am shamed at the loss of life in Iraq, all the soldiers, and the 100,000 Iraqi civilians who have died. Nothing sticks to this administration, even more so than Reagan. I will be doing a lot of praying in the next 3 days.theresahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00895177416514286875noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8670182.post-1099140745882418622004-10-30T05:52:00.000-07:002004-10-30T05:52:00.000-07:00........................ BULGEE UPDATE - 2 stories...........................<br />BULGEE UPDATE - 2 stories in the air BUT linked<br />........................<br /><br />The "Bulgegate" news story has gotten a lot of attention, largely being suppored by the suspicion President Bush was wired in the debates. To support this theory, we have a wire under his tie, strange speech patterns, a bulge on his back, and most importantly: past evidence of earpiece use. <br /><br />I am still convinced of the merits of the "wired" argument. In my opinion Bush is clearly wired.<br /><br />I suggest that he could be "wired" and also have a health problem. The more evidence I see, the more I indeed start to suspect two motives at work here. What we have here folks, I think, is a wire and a bulge and they may not know very much about eachother. I am going to publish another photo soon to clearly demonstrating that if the Bulge on Bush's back was a communications device, it was huge. I am also going to make some rough calculations on its size and publish that.<br /><br />Nobody involved thinks what is happening is only a health related issue, me included.<br /><br />So the article above is to articulte the idea both options are still on the table. Bush could actually be both "wired" and have had a medical device on. This sort of device is necessary in hi stress situations, which could explain why it was always there.<br /><br />I wanted to restate the defibrillator case so the conversation was not 100% prompter related.... I think its very important to keep all options alive as long as there is compelling evidence to support it. That increases the chances of important information coming forward.----------------------------------------------------------------------------<A HREF="http://www.blogger.com/r?http%3A%2F%2Fbulgegate.blogspot.com%2F">Read the article</A>Political Commentatorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07055531258403792692noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8670182.post-1099133521864310772004-10-30T03:52:00.000-07:002004-10-30T03:52:00.000-07:00nicely written... i'm convincednicely written... i'm convincedAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8670182.post-1099132685514636202004-10-30T03:38:00.000-07:002004-10-30T03:38:00.000-07:00Better than pill-gate... Yes... the sportsman cr...Better than pill-gate...<br /><br />Yes... the sportsman crowd is jealous of the bulge-style coverage and started their own blog on a previously unheard of KERRY rumor... yes its GUN-GATE.<br /><br />well at least they are sticking to something they know about. Huntin' dogs n' guns.<br /><br />Dont bother to read the dribble... the pictures say it all. Actually the dribble is pretty good.<br /><br />http://www.sportsmenforkerryedwards.com/jkhunting.htmAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8670182.post-1099130444437647032004-10-30T03:00:00.000-07:002004-10-30T03:00:00.000-07:00I always thought that the device Bush used in deba...I always thought that the device Bush used in debate 1 (ipod size bulge)<br />was probably replaced because it didnt work, or didn't work well. The<br />shape in debate 2 and 3 seem different but consistent with each other.<br /> Bush did better in debates 2 & 3, while he slipped a few times,<br />neither debate was as ugly of a scene as debate 1.<br /><br />Why I think its a wire (secret service OR cheating device):<br /><br />- Its the most plausible theory in my opinion.<br />- The salon.com story named source mentioned the wire, and coaching<br />being used in the past<br />- Another (unnamed) source says the same in another article<br />- The ex-interpreter says the same<br />- I've had 2 very good but anonymous "tips" stating that its a wire,<br />details were provided but they matched what we already know.<br />- I have word from a CONFIRMED retired Gov't agent stating that a<br />wireless device is often used for ambassadorial security. This source<br />did the security.<br />- The secret service system already in-place could easily have been<br />used for coaching during debates and testimony. (see debate rules for<br />the location of the coaching)<br />- The technology exists and is available, also in the private sector<br />- The strange speech patterns and eye movements by Bush support coaching<br />- Bush can't read a teleprompter well. Instances of long, elaborate<br />speeches being memorized in situations not requiring memorization are<br />documented<br />- Coaching has been heard in situations OTHER than the disputed Chirac<br />video.<br />- Several journalists have said (some to me personally) that it has<br />been widely speculated that Bush wears a wire for quite some time.<br />Reuters reporter says the same, mentons State of Union address<br />specifically.<br />- I think the receiver is not the bulge, the encryption/antenna is.<br />These are thin and relatively flat and are designed to lay on the back.<br /> The receiver is at belt level and a magnetic induction loop wire<br />travels up the back and near the earpiece. It needs to be somewhat<br />close to the earpiece.<br />-Last, ever take a good look at the secret service earpieces? They<br />are not wireless, but they ALWAYS wire down the back, not down the<br />chest.<br /><br />The medical theory is a good one as well, it has some compelling<br />evidence. The physical, family med. history, slurred speech & past<br />speaking performance, fainting, pretzel, and bike crash, plus the<br />defibrillator.<br /><br /> I think that Kerry, Clinton or the DNC would have made something more<br />of this if it wasn't a secret service wire. The bulge is too<br />undeniable for me to believe that it wasn't looked into, or known<br />about. If this was a medical issue they would be all over it, like<br />Cheney last time. They are not making a fuss over this because they've<br />been told its a security thing.<br /><br />The question remains... I think a wire exists, but how was it used?<br />Thats the smoking gun.<br /><br />Just my opinion, nuff said. what a rant.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8670182.post-1099128418153766142004-10-30T02:26:00.000-07:002004-10-30T02:26:00.000-07:00very clean and succinct...nice to hear your input....very clean and succinct...nice to hear your input...for all the volume your voice may have, is it enough to be heard though...at least in time for voters to get to decide what they think of bush's, uh...fashion foible.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com